Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37487720›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Joint Display of Integrated Data Collection for Mixed Methods Research: An Illustration From a Pediatric Oncology Quality Improvement Study.

C Nathan Nessle, Lauren V Ghazal, Sung W Choi, Michael D Fetters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C Nathan NessleDivision of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan cnessle@med.umich.edu.
Lauren V GhazalSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Sung W ChoiDivision of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Michael D FettersMixed Methods Program and Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

NPGH LEADERs YR12: OBSSR (Greenberg, Ngwafong Mukere) & NIBIB (Lee)D43TW009345 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Dibyadyuti Datta, Chandy C. John · 2017 to 2026
$15.2M
Interdisciplinary Research Training Center in Cancer Care DeliveryT32CA236621 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lauren P Wallner · 2020 to 2026
$2.8M
Patient-Oriented Research and Mentoring in Hematopoietic Cell TransplantationK24HL156896 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SUNG WON CHOI · 2021 to 2026
$870k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009345NCI NIH HHS T32 CA236621NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL156896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResearchers often struggle to integrate quantitative and qualitative data. Joint displays of data collected using mixed methods provide a framework for supporting integration, yet the literature lacks methodologic articles illustrating in detail the iterative nature of constructing such displays. We demonstrate the process for creating a joint display for integrating the collection of data obtained by qualitative and quantitative methods.

methodsWithin a convergent mixed methods cohort study, the Early Discharge of Febrile Neutropenic Children with Cancer Study, we constructed a joint display to inform integrated collection of 2 forms of data (quantitative and qualitative) from 2 sources (a patient-caregiver mixed methods survey and a manual abstraction of medical records).

resultsIn a first step, we used a data sources table to align related quantitative and qualitative data. The resulting table consisted of 2 side-by-side columns based on the mixed survey data. After several additional iterative steps, we constructed a final 6-column joint display. This final display delineated the separate data sources, linked constructs to the quantitative and qualitative variables within each source, and integrated the constructs across the separate data sources.

conclusionsChallenges of integration, though not unique to prospective mixed methods cohort studies, stem from the sheer volume of qualitative and quantitative information and the need to logically organize the data in preparation for integrated data analysis. Tailoring joint displays to specific studies is challenging, but mixed methods researchers who embrace the methodologic malleability can produce effective joint displays to illustrate the mixed data collection linkages and create a preliminary structure ultimately for organizing mixed data findings.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementResearch DesignChildCohort StudiesHumansProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnairesdata displayfebrile neutropeniamethodological studiesmixed methods integrationpediatric cancerqualitative researchquantitative researchresearch designstudy planningsupportive care

Identifiers

PMID37487720
PMCPMC10365872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.