Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37487679›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Older adults' medical preferences for the end of life: a cross-sectional population-based survey in Switzerland.

Sarah Vilpert, Clément Meier, Jeanne Berche, Gian Domenico Borasio, Ralf J Jox, Jürgen Maurer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah VilpertFaculty of Business and Economics (HEC), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland sarah.vilpert@unil.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-8194-0421
Clément MeierFaculty of Business and Economics (HEC), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jeanne BercheCentre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gian Domenico BorasioPalliative and Supportive Care Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ralf J JoxPalliative and Supportive Care Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jürgen MaurerFaculty of Business and Economics (HEC), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHCentre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CH

Funding

HRS Yrs29-34: Y33 SSA CoFundingU01AG009740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jessica Faul, KENNETH M LANGA · 1990 to 2026
$555.8M
Understanding and Improving Healthcare Decision-Making and Outcomes for People Living with Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasP01AG005842 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI KOSALI ILAYPERUMA SIMON · 1986 to 2026
$56.5M
Enhancing the Comparability of SHARE with HRS and ELSAR01AG052527 · NIA · MAX PLANCK INST/SOCIAL LAW/SOCIAL POLICY · PI BOERSCH-SUPAN, AXEL H · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
DEVELOPING AN ISRAELI VERSION OF THE HRS/SHARE PROJECTR21AG025169 · NIA · HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM · PI LITWIN, HOWARD · 2004 to 2006
$297k
NIA NIH HHS HHSN271201300071CNIA NIH HHS P01 AG005842NIA NIH HHS R01 AG052527NIA NIH HHS R21 AG025169NIA NIH HHS U01 AG009740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMedical decision-making at the end of life is common and should be as patient-centred as possible. Our study investigates older adults' preferences towards three medical treatments that are frequently included in advance directive forms and their association with social, regional and health characteristics.

settingA cross-sectional study using population-based data of wave 8 (2019/2020) of the Swiss component of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe.

participants1430 adults aged 58 years and older living in Switzerland. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Three questions on the preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); life-prolonging treatment in case of high risk of permanent mental incapacity; reduced awareness (sedation) to relieve unbearable pain and symptoms. Their associations with individuals' social, regional and health characteristics.

resultsMost older adults expressed a wish to receive CPR (58.6%) and to forgo life-prolonging treatment in case of permanent mental incapacity (92.2%). Most older adults also indicated that they would accept reduced awareness if necessary to receive effective treatment for pain and distressing symptoms (59.2%). Older adults' treatment preferences for CPR and life-prolonging treatment differed according to sex, age, partnership status, linguistic region and health status, while willingness to accept reduced awareness for effective symptom treatment was more similarly distributed across population groups.

conclusionsSimultaneous preferences for CPR and refusal of life-prolonging treatment might appear to be conflicting treatment goals. Considering individuals' values and motivations can help clarify ambivalent treatment decisions. Structured advance care planning processes with trained professionals allows for exploring individuals' motivations and values and helps to identify congruent care and treatment goals.

Indexed as

DeathPainAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeHumansSwitzerlandagedcardiopulmonary resuscitationintensive & critical carepain managementpublic healthquality of life

Identifiers

PMID37487679
PMCPMC10373667
OpenAlexW4385217071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.