Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37487667›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2023

Efficacy of PD-(L)1 blockade monotherapy compared with PD-(L)1 blockade plus chemotherapy in first-line PD-L1-positive advanced lung adenocarcinomas: a cohort study.

Arielle Elkrief, Joao M Victor Alessi, Biagio Ricciuti, Samantha Brown, Hira Rizvi, Isabel R Preeshagul, Xinan Wang, Federica Pecci, Alessandro Di Federico, Giuseppe Lamberti and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arielle ElkriefDepartment of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1981-1535
Joao M Victor AlessiLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8072-5946
Biagio RicciutiLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0651-2678
Samantha BrownDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Hira RizviDepartment of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Isabel R PreeshagulDepartment of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Xinan WangEnvironmental Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Federica PecciLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Alessandro Di FedericoLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Giuseppe LambertiLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jacklynn V EggerDepartment of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jamie E ChaftDepartment of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Charles M RudinDepartment of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5204-3465
Gregory J RielyDepartment of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Mark G KrisDepartment of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Marc LadanyiHuman Oncology & Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Yuan ChenDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Matthew D HellmannDepartment of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2670-9777
Ronglai ShenDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Mark M AwadLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0928-5244
Adam J SchoenfeldDepartment of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA schoenfa@mskcc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-2644-1416
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
The Boston Lung Cancer Survival CohortU01CA209414 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI David C Christiani · 2017 to 2026
$12.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U01 CA209414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-agent PD-(L)1 blockade (IO) alone or in combination with chemotherapy (Chemotherapy-IO) is approved first-line therapies in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs) with PD-L1 expression ≥1%. These regimens have not been compared prospectively. The primary objective was to compare first-line efficacies of single-agent IO to Chemotherapy-IO in patients with advanced LUADs. Secondary objectives were to explore if clinical, pathological, and genomic features were associated with differential response to Chemotherapy-IO versus IO.

methodsThis was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were patients with advanced LUADs with tumor PD-L1 ≥1% treated with first-line Chemotherapy-IO or IO. To compare the first-line efficacies of single-agent IO to Chemotherapy-IO, we conducted inverse probability weighted Cox proportional hazards models using estimated propensity scores.

resultsThe cohort analyzed included 866 patients. Relative to IO, Chemotherapy-IO was associated with improved objective response rate (ORR) (44% vs 35%, p=0.007) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with tumor PD-L1≥1% (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97, p=0.021) or PD-L1≥50% (ORR 55% vs 38%, p<0.001; PFS HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.87, p=0.002). Using propensity-adjusted analyses, only never-smokers in the PD-L1≥50% subgroup derived a differential survival benefit from Chemotherapy-IO vs IO (p=0.013). Among patients with very high tumor PD-L1 expression (≥90%), there were no differences in outcome between treatment groups. No genomic factors conferred differential survival benefit to Chemotherapy-IO versus IO.

conclusionsWhile the addition of chemotherapy to PD-(L)1 blockade increases the probability of initial response, never-smokers with tumor PD-L1≥50% comprise the only population identified that derived an apparent survival benefit with treatment intensification.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenCohort StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesB7-H1 AntigenCombined Modality TherapyGenetic MarkersImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Identifiers

PMID37487667
PMCPMC10373730
OpenAlexW4385215055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.