Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2023
Online vestibular rehabilitation for chronic vestibular syndrome: 36-month follow-up of a randomised controlled trial in general practice.
Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health economic evaluation of an interdisciplinary care pathway for older patients with vertigo, dizziness and balance disorders in primary care (MobilE-PHY2) - a cluster-randomised trial.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- Factors influencing appropriate vestibular care: An interview study with general practitioners and patients.The European journal of general practice · 2025Article
- Study protocol for a nationwide implementation of internet-based vestibular rehabilitation for patients with chronic vestibular symptoms (I-RECOVER).Implementation science communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVestibular rehabilitation (VR) is the preferred treatment for chronic vestibular symptoms such as dizziness and vertigo. An internet-based programme was developed to increase uptake of VR. The authors have previously reported that internet-based VR resulted in a clinically relevant decrease of vestibular symptoms for up to 6 months, compared with usual care.
aimTo evaluate long-term outcomes of internet-based VR in patients with chronic vestibular syndrome. DESIGN AND
settingA randomised controlled trial was conducted in Dutch general practice involving 322 participants aged ≥50 years with chronic vestibular syndrome. Participants were randomised to stand-alone VR, blended VR (with physiotherapy support), and usual care. Usual care participants were allowed to cross over to stand-alone VR 6 months after randomisation.
methodParticipants were approached 36 months after randomisation. The primary outcome was the presence of vestibular symptoms as measured by the vertigo symptom scale-short form (VSS-SF). Secondary outcomes were dizziness-related impairment, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and healthcare utilisation.
resultsAt 36-month follow-up, 65% of participants filled in the VSS-SF. In the usual care group, 38% of participants had crossed over to VR at 6 months. There were no significant differences in vestibular symptoms between VR groups and usual care (mean difference = -0.8 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.8 to 1.2, for stand-alone VR; -0.3, 95% CI = -2.2 to 1.7, for blended VR). In VR groups, clinically relevant improvement compared with baseline was maintained over time.
conclusionInternet-based VR provides a maintained improvement of vestibular symptoms for up to 36 months in patients with chronic vestibular syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.