Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37487241›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Risk of occurrence of electromagnetic interference from the application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the sensing function of implantable defibrillators.

Saba Suhail Arain, Anja Cretnik, Martin Huemer, Philipp Attanasio, Patrick Nagel, Ulf Landmesser, Juliane Hardt, Kiran Sidhu, Verena Tscholl, Mattias Roser

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Magnetic interference from consumer devices: a renewed challenge for the safety of cardiac implantable electronic devices.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Saba Suhail ArainDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Intensivmedizin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5186-0399
Anja CretnikDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Intensivmedizin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9994-7805
Martin HuemerDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Intensivmedizin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Philipp AttanasioDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Intensivmedizin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6559-7499
Patrick NagelDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Intensivmedizin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Ulf LandmesserDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Intensivmedizin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0214-3203
Juliane HardtDepartment of Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training for Health in the Human-Animal-Environment Interface, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4514-5698
Kiran SidhuPenn Heart and Vascular Center, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0399-5106
Verena TschollDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Intensivmedizin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2748-2540
Mattias RoserDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Intensivmedizin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DEUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is an established method for pain relief. But electrical TENS currents are also a source of electromagnetic interference (EMI). Thus, TENS is considered to be contraindicated in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients. However, data might be outdated due to considerable advances in ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) filtering and noise protection algorithm technologies. The aim of this pilot safety study was to re-evaluate the safety of TENS in patients with modern ICDs. METHODS AND

resultsOne hundred and seven patients equipped with 55 different models of ICD/CRT with defibrillators from 4 manufacturers underwent a standardized test protocol including TENS at the cervical spine and the thorax, at 2 stimulation modes-high-frequency TENS (80 Hz) and burst-mode TENS (2 Hz). Potential interference monitoring included continuous documentation of ECG Lead II, intracardiac electrograms and the marker channel. Electromagnetic interference was detected in 17 of 107 patients (15.9%). Most frequent were: interpretations as a premature ventricular beats (VS/S) in 15 patients (14%), noise reversion in 5 (4.6%) which resulted in temporary asynchronous pacing in 3 (2.8%), interpretation as ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in 2 (1.9%), and premature atrial beat in 2 (1.9%) patients. Electromagnetic interference occurrence was influenced by position (chest, P < 0.01), higher current intensity (P < 0.01), and manufacturer (P = 0.012).

conclusionOverall, only intermittent and minor EMI were detected. Prior to the use of TENS in patients with ICDs, they should undergo testing under the supervision of a cardiac device specialist.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantableTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAlgorithmsElectromagnetic PhenomenaHumansPain ManagementVentricular FibrillationEMIImplantable defibrillatorTENS

Identifiers

PMID37487241
PMCPMC10365842
OpenAlexW4385231102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.