ArticlePloS one2023
Haplotype-level metabarcoding of freshwater macroinvertebrate species: A prospective tool for population genetic analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating Organism Abundance Using Within-Sample Haplotype Frequencies of eDNA Data.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Biomonitoring 2.0 Refined: observing local change through metaphylogeography using a community-based eDNA metabarcoding monitoring network.BMC biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabarcoding is a molecular-based tool capable of large quantity high-throughput species identification from bulk samples that is a faster and more cost-effective alternative to conventional DNA-sequencing approaches. Still, further exploration and assessment of the laboratory and bioinformatics strategies are required to unlock the potential of metabarcoding-based inference of haplotype information. In this study, we assessed the inference of freshwater macroinvertebrate haplotypes from metabarcoding data in a mock sample. We also examined the influence of DNA template concentration and PCR cycle on detecting true and spurious haplotypes. We tested this strategy on a mock sample containing twenty individuals from four species with known haplotypes based on the 658-bp Folmer region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase gene. We recovered fourteen zero-radius operational taxonomic units (zOTUs) of 421-bp length, with twelve zOTUs having a 100% match with the Sanger haplotype sequences. High-quality reads relatively increased with increasing PCR cycles, and the relative abundance of each zOTU was consistent for each cycle. This suggests that increasing the PCR cycles from 24 to 64 did not affect the relative abundance of each zOTU. As metabarcoding becomes more established and laboratory protocols and bioinformatic pipelines are continuously being developed, our study demonstrated the method's ability to infer intraspecific variability while highlighting the challenges that must be addressed before its eventual application for population genetic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.