Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37486735›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2023

A Novel and Integrated Digitally Supported System of Care for Depression and Anxiety: Findings From an Open Trial.

Kate Wolitzky-Taylor, Richard LeBeau, Inna Arnaudova, Nora Barnes-Horowitz, Elizabeth Gong-Guy, Scott Fears, Eliza Congdon, Nelson Freimer, Michelle Craske

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Anxiety and depression in emerging adults: The STAND program as a model of scalable screening and intervention.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kate Wolitzky-TaylorDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6199-4350
Richard LeBeauDepartment of Psychology, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6866-9793
Inna ArnaudovaDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4837-9780
Nora Barnes-HorowitzDepartment of Psychology, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5341-8927
Elizabeth Gong-GuyDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7705-8655
Scott FearsDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6443-2318
Eliza CongdonDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2921-0944
Nelson FreimerDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3586-6587
Michelle CraskeDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3704-5240

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global burden of anxiety and depression has created an urgent need for scalable approaches to increase access to evidence-based mental health care. The Screening and Treatment for Anxiety and Depression (STAND) system of care was developed to meet this need through the use of internet-connected devices for assessment and provision of treatment. STAND triages to level of care (monitoring only, digital therapy with coaches, digital therapy assisted by clinicians in training, and clinical care) and then continuously monitors symptoms to adapt level of care. Triaging and adaptation are based on symptom severity and suicide risk scores obtained from computerized adaptive testing administered remotely.

objectiveThis article discusses how the STAND system of care improves upon current clinical paradigms, and presents preliminary data on feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of STAND in a sample of US-based university students.

methodsUS-based university students were recruited and enrolled in an open trial of the STAND system of care. Participants were triaged based on initial symptom severity derived from a computerized adaptive test and monitored over 40 weeks on anxiety, depression, and suicide risk to inform treatment adaptation and evaluate preliminary effectiveness.

resultsNearly 5000 students were screened and 516 received care. Depression and anxiety severity scores improved across all tiers (P<.001 in all cases). Suicide risk severity improved in the highest tier (ie, clinical care; P<.001). Acceptability and feasibility were demonstrated.

conclusionsSTAND is a feasible and acceptable model of care that can reach large numbers of individuals. STAND showed preliminary effectiveness on all primary outcome measures. Current directions to improve STAND are described.

Indexed as

anxietycare modelcare systemCBTcognitive behavioral therapycollegedepressiondepressivedigital mental healtheHealthmental healthmHealthmodel of careonline supportpostsecondarypsychotherapyservice deliverystratified models of carestudentstudent mental healthsystem of careuniversity

Identifiers

PMID37486735
PMCPMC10407647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.