ReviewBiochemical genetics2024
Bioinformatics Analysis of the Genetic and Epigenetic Alterations of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptors in Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Review in Biochemical genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unmasking Cancer Risk in Heritable PAH: The Hidden Role of BMPR2 in Epithelial Tumorigenesis.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The leading cause of mortality in patients with breast cancer is metastasis, and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling activation regulates metastasis in breast cancer. This study explored the genetic and epigenetic modification of BMP receptor genes associated with metastatic breast cancer cells using bioinformatics. The genetic and epigenetic alterations of BMP receptors (BMPR1A, BMPR1B, BMPR2, ACVR2A, ACVR1, ACVR2B, ACVR1B, HJV, and ENG) were examined using cBioportal and methSurv, respectively. mRNA expression was analyzed using TNM plot and bcgenex, and protein expression was studied using Human Protein Atlas. Prognostic value and ROC were investigated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) and ROC plot, respectively. Finally, mutant function was predicted using several databases, including PolyPhen-2, FATHMM, Mutation Assessor, and PredictSNP. Oncoprint analysis showed genetic alterations in BMPR1A (39%), BMPR1B (13%), BMPR2 (34%), ACVR2A (14%), ACVR1 (7%), ACVR2B (13), ACVR1B (35%), HJV (40%), and ENG (33%) across the patients with breast cancer in The Metastatic Breast Cancer Project. The mRNA and protein levels of BMPR2 were increased in metastatic breast tumor tissues compared with those in normal and breast tumor tissues. BMPR1A and BMPR2 showed the highest and lowest levels of epigenetic alterations among the BMP receptors, respectively. The patients with breast cancer who had low levels of BMPR2 had a better overall survival (OS) than those with high levels of BMPR2. Functional mutation prediction showed that mutants in BMPR2 (R272L, E274K, and L685F), ACVR2A (S127L), and ACVR1B (R484H), are deleterious, probably damaging, and possess a cancer phenotype. ROC plot revealed no BMP receptors correlated with endocrine therapy sensitivity. BMPR1B, BMPR2, and ACVR2A levels were significantly linked as moderate prediction of anti-HER2, BMPR2, and ACVR1B demonstrated moderate predictive potential for chemotherapy sensitivity. This study contributed in fully comprehending the significance of genetic and epigenetic alterations in BMP receptors and BMP signaling in metastatic breast cancer cells for the development of breast cancer treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.