Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37486506›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2023

Computational Models for Biomarker Discovery.

Konstantina Skolariki, Themis P Exarchos, Panagiotis Vlamos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Konstantina SkolarikiDepartment of Informatics, Ionian University, Corfu, Greece. c19skol@ionio.gr.
Themis P ExarchosDepartment of Informatics, Ionian University, Corfu, Greece.
Panagiotis VlamosDepartment of Informatics, Ionian University, Corfu, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a prevalent and debilitating neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive cognitive decline. Early diagnosis and accurate prediction of disease progression are critical for developing effective therapeutic interventions. In recent years, computational models have emerged as powerful tools for biomarker discovery and disease prediction in Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative diseases. This paper explores the use of computational models, particularly machine learning techniques, in analyzing large volumes of data and identifying patterns related to disease progression. The significance of early diagnosis, the challenges in classifying patients at the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage, and the potential of computational models to improve diagnostic accuracy are examined. Furthermore, the importance of incorporating diverse biomarkers, including genetic, molecular, and neuroimaging indicators, to enhance the predictive capabilities of these models is highlighted. The paper also presents case studies on the application of computational models in simulating disease progression, analyzing neurodegenerative cascades, and predicting the future development of Alzheimer's. Overall, computational models for biomarker discovery offer promising opportunities to advance our understanding of Alzheimer's disease, facilitate early diagnosis, and guide the development of targeted therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionBiomarkersComputer SimulationDisease ProgressionHumansNeuroimagingBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseComputational modelsMachine LearningNeurodegenerative diseases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.