Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37486343›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

The Clinical Implications of Reversions in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Pathogenic Variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 after Progression on Rucaparib.

Timothy J Brown, Arielle Yablonovitch, Jacob E Till, Jennifer Yen, Lesli A Kiedrowski, Ryan Hood, Mark H O'Hara, Ursina Teitelbaum, Thomas B Karasic, Charles Schneider and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03140670 (A Phase 2, Open Label Study of Rucaparib in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and a Known Deleterious Germline or Somatic BRCA or PALB2 Mutation), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03140670 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Phase 2, Open Label Study of Rucaparib in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and a Known Deleterious Germline or Somatic BRCA or PALB2 Mutation

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineRan2017 to 2023Enrolled46ConditionsPancreatic CancerArmsRUCAPARIB
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Phase II Trial of Niraparib in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Harboring Pathogenic Variants in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and CHEK2.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  2. Genomic and Epigenomic ctDNA Profiling in Liquid Biopsies from Heavily Pretreated Patients with DNA Damage Response-Deficient Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy J BrownAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-4843-4639
Arielle YablonovitchGuardant Health, Redwood City, California.ORCID 0000-0001-6339-4519
Jacob E TillAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-2824-1282
Jennifer YenGuardant Health, Redwood City, California.ORCID 0000-0002-8580-220X
Lesli A KiedrowskiGuardant Health, Redwood City, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5081-2005
Ryan HoodAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0009-0007-1795-9428
Mark H O'HaraAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-2751-6122
Ursina TeitelbaumAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-6602-7252
Thomas B KarasicAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-9157-5392
Charles SchneiderAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-3768-8473
Erica L CarpenterAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-0735-3605
Katherine NathansonAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-6740-0901
Susan M DomchekAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-5914-7272
Kim A ReissAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-0774-9914
University of Pennsylvania · USGuardant (United States) · US

Funding

CANCER CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING GRANTT32CA009679 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Richard Aplenc, Karen Glanz · 1992 to 2026
$11.1M
NCI NIH HHS L30 CA274783NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePARP inhibitors (PARPi) provide an effective maintenance option for patients with BRCA- or PALB2-mutated pancreatic cancer. However, mechanisms of PARPi resistance and optimal post-PARPi therapeutic strategies are poorly characterized. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe collected paired cell-free DNA samples and post-PARPi clinical data on 42 patients with advanced, platinum-sensitive pancreatic cancer who were treated with maintenance rucaparib on NCT03140670, of whom 32 developed progressive disease.

resultsPeripherally detected, acquired BRCA or PALB2 reversion variants were uncommon (5/30; 16.6%) in patients who progressed on rucaparib. Reversions were significantly associated with rapid resistance to PARPi treatment (median PFS, 3.7 vs. 12.5 months; P = 0.001) and poor overall survival (median OS, 6.2 vs. 23.0 months; P < 0.0001). All patients with reversions received rechallenge with platinum-based chemotherapy following PARPi progression and experienced faster progression on this therapy than those without reversion variants (real-world time-to-treatment discontinuation, 2.4 vs. 5.8 months; P = 0.004). Of the patients who progressed on PARPi and received further chemotherapy, the OS from initiation of second-line therapy was significantly lower in those with reversion variants than in those without (5.5 vs. 12.0 months, P = 0.002). Finally, high levels of tumor shedding were independently associated with poor outcomes in patients who received rucaparib.

conclusionsAcquired reversion variants were uncommon but detrimental in a population of patients with advanced BRCA- or PALB2-related pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who received maintenance rucaparib. Reversion variants led to rapid progression on PARPi, rapid failure of subsequent platinum-based treatment, and poor OS of patients. The identification of such variants in the blood may have both predictive and prognostic value. See related commentary by Tsang and Gallinger, p. 5005.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinFemaleHumansIndolesPlatinumPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPrognosisBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanFanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinIndolesPALB2 protein, humanPlatinumPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitorsrucaparib

Identifiers

PMID37486343
PMCPMC10806928
OpenAlexW4385186842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.