ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)
COVID-19 of differing severity: from bulk to single-cell expression data analysis.
Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is raging worldwide and causes an immense disease burden. Despite this, the biomarkers and targeting drugs of COVID-19 of differing severity remain largely unknown. Based on the GSE164805 dataset, we identified modules most critical for mild COVID-19 (mCOVID-19) and severe COVID-19 (sCOVID-19) through WGCNA, respectively. We subsequently constructed a protein-protein interaction network, and detected 16 hub genes for mCOVID-19 and 10 hub genes for sCOVID-19, followed by the prediction of upstream transcription factors (TFs) and kinases. The enrichment analysis then showed downregulation of TNFA signaling via NFKB for mCOVID-19, as well as downregulation of MYC targets V1 for sCOVID-19. Infiltration degrees of many immune cells, such as macrophages, were also sharply different between mCOVID-19 and sCOVID-19 samples. Predicted protein targeting drugs with the highest scores nearly all belong to naturally derived or synthetic glucocorticoids. For the two single-cell RNA-seq datasets, we explored the expression distribution of hub genes for mCOVID-19/sCOVID-19 in each cell type. The expression levels of PRKCA, MCM5, TYMS, RBBP4, BCL6, FLOT1, KDM6B, and TLR2 were found to be cell-type-specific. Furthermore, the expression levels of 10 hub genes for mCOVID-19 were significantly upregulated in PBMCs between eight healthy controls and eight mCOVID-19 patients at our institution. Collectively, we detected critical modules, pathways, TFs, kinases, immune cells, targeting drugs, hub genes, and their expression distributions in different cell types that may involve the pathogenesis of COVID-19 of differing severity, which may propel earlier diagnosis and more effective treatment of this intractable disease in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.