ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023
Deep learning-based motion correction algorithm for coronary CT angiography: Lowering the phase requirement for morphological and functional evaluation.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-dimensional image metric maps for characterizing local image changes associated with AI-based motion correction in coronary CT.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Motion correction algorithm improves right coronary artery image quality at heart rates > 75 bpm in non-ECG-gated coronary CT angiography.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Cardiac CT Coronary Motion Correction Method with Temporal Weight Adjustment: Clinical Data Evaluation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Future Applications of Cardiothoracic CT.Radiology · 2025Review
- Achieving low radiation dose and contrast agents dose in coronary CT angiography at 60-kVp ultra-low tube voltage.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based motion correction algorithm for coronary CT angiography: Lowering the phase requirement for morphological and functional evaluation.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the performance of a deep learning-based motion correction algorithm (MCA) at various cardiac phases of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), and determine the extent to which it may allow for reliable morphological and functional evaluation. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe acquired image data of 53 CCTA cases, where the patient heart rate (HR) was ≥75 bpm, were reconstructed at 0, ±2, ±4, ±6, and ±8% deviations from each optimal systolic phase, with and without the MCA, yielding a total of 954 images (53 cases × 9 phases × 2 reconstructions). The overall image quality and diagnostic confidence were graded by two radiologists using a 5-point scale, with scores ≥3 being deemed clinically interpretable. Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, vessel sharpness, and circularity were measured. The CCTA-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) was calculated in 38 vessels on 24 patients to identify functionally significant stenosis, using the invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) as reference. All metrics were compared between two reconstructions at various phases.
resultsInferior image quality was observed as the phase deviation was enlarged. However, MCA significantly improved the image quality at nonoptimal phases and the optimal phase. Coronary artery evaluation was feasible within 4% phase deviation using MCA, with interpretable overall image quality and high diagnostic confidence. With MCA, the performance of identifying functionally significant stenosis via CT-FFR was increased for images at various phase deviations. However, obvious decrease in accuracy, as compared to the image at the optimal phase, was found on those with deviations >4%.
conclusionThe deep learning-based MCA allows up to 4% phase deviation in acquiring CCTA for reliable morphological and functional evaluation on patients with high HRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.