Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37485446›Full record

ReviewFuture science OA2023

Ocular complications of antineoplastic therapies.

Abbas Bader, Madeline Begemann, Ammar Al-Obaidi, Muhammad Hamza Habib, Faiz Anwer, Shahzad Raza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future science OA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Management of severe capecitabine-induced corneal toxicity.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Abbas BaderUniversity of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, 5000 Holmes St, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.
Madeline BegemannSaint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City, 4401 Wornall Rd, Kansas City, MO 64111, USA.
Ammar Al-ObaidiSaint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City, 4401 Wornall Rd, Kansas City, MO 64111, USA.
Muhammad Hamza HabibRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1353-4437
Faiz AnwerCleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6914-7439
Shahzad RazaCleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2739-2265
Cleveland Clinic · USSaint Luke's Hospital · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocular complications of antineoplastic agents can have a profound effect on the quality of life of cancer patients. New oncologic treatments like monoclonal antibodies, immunotherapies, antibody-drug conjugates, checkpoint inhibitors and growth factor receptors have resulted in increased ocular complications. These ocular complications differs in respect to distinct mechanisms of actions and lead to significant challenges in the management of cancer patients. In this review, we reviewed literature, clinical studies and cases detailing ocular complications due to administration of antineoplastic agents and emphasized the need for communication between oncologists and ophthalmologists toward early detection and management of ocular complications.

Indexed as

antineoplastic agentscancerchemotherapyophthalmic side effects

Identifiers

PMID37485446
PMCPMC10357395
OpenAlexW4379054823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.