ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2023
A point-of-care pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic trial in critically ill children: Study design and feasibility.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05055830 (Clinically Integrated Opportunistic PK/PD Trial in Critically Ill Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinically Integrated Opportunistic PK/PD Trial in Critically Ill Children
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- External Pharmacokinetic Model Evaluation of Caffeine in Critically Ill Neonates With Heart Disease Using Data Collected From a Pragmatic Platform Trial.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026Article
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine in Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease and Associations with Acute Kidney Injury.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: High-quality, efficient, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and safety studies in children are needed. Point-of-care trials in adults have facilitated clinical trial participation for patients and providers, minimized the disruption of clinical workflow, and capitalized on routine data collection. The feasibility and value of point-of-care trials to study PK/PD in children are unknown, but appear promising. The Opportunistic PK/PD Trial in Critically Ill Children with Heart Disease (OPTIC) is a programmatic point-of-care approach to PK/PD trials in critically ill children that seeks to overcome barriers of traditional pediatric PK/PD studies to generate safety, efficacy, PK, and PD data across multiple medications, ages, and disease processes. Methods: This prospective, open-label, non-randomized point-of-care trial will characterize the PK/PD and safety of multiple drugs given per routine care to critically ill children with heart disease using opportunistic and scavenged biospecimen samples and data collected from the electronic health record. OPTIC has one informed consent form with drug-specific appendices, streamlining study structure and institutional review board approval. OPTIC capitalizes on routine data collection through multiple data sources that automatically capture demographics, medications, laboratory values, vital signs, flowsheets, and other clinical data. This innovative automatic data collection minimizes the burden of data collection and facilitates trial conduct. Data will be validated across sources to ensure accuracy of dataset variables. Discussion: OPTIC's point-of-care trial design and automated data acquisition via the electronic health record may provide a mechanism for conducting minimal risk, minimal burden, high efficiency trials and support drug development in historically understudied patient populations. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT05055830. Registered on September 24, 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.