Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37485312›Full record

ArticleSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2023

Estimating sleep duration: performance of open-source processing of actigraphy compared to in-laboratory polysomnography in the community.

Kelly Sansom, Amy Reynolds, Joanne McVeigh, Diego R Mazzotti, Satvinder S Dhaliwal, Kathleen Maddison, Jennifer Walsh, Bhajan Singh, Peter Eastwood, Nigel McArdle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kelly SansomCentre for Sleep Science, School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Amy ReynoldsFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9534-8699
Joanne McVeighCurtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Diego R MazzottiDivision of Medical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, KS, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3924-9199
Satvinder S DhaliwalCurtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, B305, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.
Kathleen MaddisonCentre for Sleep Science, School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Jennifer WalshCentre for Sleep Science, School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3950-6079
Bhajan SinghCentre for Sleep Science, School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Peter EastwoodFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4490-4138
Nigel McArdleCentre for Sleep Science, School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3199-8569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparisons of actigraphy findings between studies are challenging given differences between brand-specific algorithms. This issue may be minimized by using open-source algorithms. However, the accuracy of actigraphy-derived sleep parameters processed in open-source software needs to be assessed against polysomnography (PSG). Middle-aged adults from the Raine Study (

Indexed as

accelerometrymethodologynon-proprietarytriaxial

Identifiers

PMID37485312
PMCPMC10362889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.