Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37485175›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Effectiveness of an Educational Intervention on Status Epilepticus Among the Caregivers of Children With Epilepsy: An Interventional Study.

Riyadh W Alharbi, Ahmed Kaki, Sadia Tabassum

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Riyadh W AlharbiPediatric Neurology, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Ahmed KakiPediatric Neurology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Sadia TabassumPediatric Neurology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital · SAKing Fahd Medical City · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most common and well-known neurological emergencies in pediatrics, especially among kids under two years of age. Early identification and treatment are crucial in the prevention of neurological complications and morbidities. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of an educational intervention about SE among caregivers of pediatric patients with epilepsy. Methodology This interventional study was conducted among a convenient sample of 206 caregivers of pediatric patients with epilepsy in King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from November 2020 to July 2021. We included patients who were aged 14 years or less and received rescue medication prescriptions in 2020. The educational intervention was applied to caregivers, and knowledge was compared before and after the intervention. A self-administered questionnaire was utilized. Results The mean (±SD) age of children was 7.5 (±3.7) years. The mean (±SD) age of caregivers was 36.4 (±6.1) years. About 51.5% of the children were males. The majority of caregivers were mothers (89.8%). The mean (±SD) score of total knowledge was 12.3/20 (±2.6) before the intervention which increased to 15.7/20 (±3.1) after the intervention, and the difference was found to be statically significant (p = 0.001). This indicates that the educational intervention was effective. Conclusions The educational intervention administered in this study significantly improved the knowledge of caregivers of pediatric patients with epilepsy and can help in providing better care to the patients.

Indexed as

caregiversemergencyinterventionknowledgesaudi arabiastatus epilepticus

Identifiers

PMID37485175
PMCPMC10361145
OpenAlexW4381548469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.