Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37485167›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Old Drugs and New Challenges: A Narrative Review of Nitazenes.

Joseph Pergolizzi, Robert Raffa, Jo Ann K LeQuang, Frank Breve, Giustino Varrassi

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cychlorphine (Journal of pain research · 2026
    Article
  13. Comprehensive method to detect nitazene analogues and xylazine in wastewater.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Article
  14. The nitazene epidemic in Estonia: a first report.European journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph PergolizziAnesthesiology, Nema Research, Inc, Naples, USA.
Robert RaffaSchool of Pharmacy, Temple University (Emeritus), Philadelphia, USA.
Jo Ann K LeQuangPain Management, NEMA Research, Inc., Naples, USA.
Frank BrevePharmacy, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.
Giustino VarrassiPain Medicine, Paolo Procacci Foundation, Rome, ITA.
Fondazione Roma · ITTemple University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitazenes are a group of compounds developed in the 1950s as opioid analgesics, but they were never approved to market. As such, they are not well known outside of academic research laboratories. A characteristic of nitazenes is their high potency (e.g., hundreds to thousands fold more potent than morphine and other opioids and tenfold more potent than fentanyl). In the past few years, several nitazenes, including "designer analogs," have been detected in the illicit drug supply and have been implicated in overdose mortality, primarily due to their exceptionally high potency. In the street drug supply, nitazenes are often found mixed with fentanyl or other agents but their presence is not always disclosed to drug buyers, who may not even be familiar with nitazenes. These drugs pose a particular challenge since there is little experience in how to reverse a nitazene overdose or potential drug-drug or drug-alcohol interactions. Public health efforts are needed to better inform street drug consumers, first responders, healthcare professionals, and the general public about these "new old drugs" that are infiltrating the recreational drug supply.

Indexed as

addictiondesigner drugsnitazenesopioidsopioid use disorderstreet drugs

Identifiers

PMID37485167
PMCPMC10361140
OpenAlexW4381548856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.