Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37484830›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2023

Connecting the science and practice of implementation - applying the lens of context to inform study design in implementation research.

Gillian Harvey, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Kate Seers, Paul Wilson, Christine Cassidy, Mark Embrett, Jiale Hu, Mark Pearson, Sonia Semenic, Junqiang Zhao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrating Occupational Health and Safety and Health Promotion: A Qualitative Study in Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gillian HarveyCaring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Jo Rycroft-MaloneFaculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Kate SeersWarwick Medical School, Faculty of Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Paul WilsonCentre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Christine CassidySchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Mark EmbrettFaculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Jiale HuCollege of Health Professions, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Mark PearsonWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, Hull, United Kingdom.
Sonia SemenicIngram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Junqiang ZhaoCentre for Research on Health and Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Ian D GrahamSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The saying "horses for courses" refers to the idea that different people and things possess different skills or qualities that are appropriate in different situations. In this paper, we apply the analogy of "horses for courses" to stimulate a debate about how and why we need to get better at selecting appropriate implementation research methods that take account of the context in which implementation occurs. To ensure that implementation research achieves its intended purpose of enhancing the uptake of research-informed evidence in policy and practice, we start from a position that implementation research should be explicitly connected to implementation practice. Building on our collective experience as implementation researchers, implementation practitioners (users of implementation research), implementation facilitators and implementation educators and subsequent deliberations with an international, inter-disciplinary group involved in practising and studying implementation, we present a discussion paper with practical suggestions that aim to inform more practice-relevant implementation research.

Indexed as

adaptationcontextimplementation practiceimplementation researchstudy design

Identifiers

PMID37484830
PMCPMC10361069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.