Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37484815›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering2023

AI Models for Protein Design are Driving Antibody Engineering.

Michael Chungyoun, Jeffrey J Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Exploring the Blueprint of Life: The Innovation in Antibody and Protein Design.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Computational peptide discovery with a genetic programming approach.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael ChungyounDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Jeffrey J GrayDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.

Funding

Prediction of the Structures of Protein ComplexesR35GM141881 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JEFFREY J GRAY · 2021 to 2026
$7.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic antibody engineering seeks to identify antibody sequences with specific binding to a target and optimized drug-like properties. When guided by deep learning, antibody generation methods can draw on prior knowledge and experimental efforts to improve this process. By leveraging the increasing quantity and quality of predicted structures of antibodies and target antigens, powerful structure-based generative models are emerging. In this review, we tie the advancements in deep learning-based protein structure prediction and design to the study of antibody therapeutics.

Indexed as

antibody designantigenDeep learninggenerative modelsprotein sequence designprotein structureprotein structure design

Identifiers

PMID37484815
PMCPMC10361400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.