Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37484694›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in aging neuroscience2023

The differential diagnosis value of radiomics-based machine learning in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jiaxiang Bian, Xiaoyang Wang, Wei Hao, Guangjian Zhang, Yuting Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Beyond Macrostructure: Is There a Role for Radiomics Analysis in Neuroimaging ?Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiaxiang BianSchool of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
Xiaoyang WangSchool of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
Wei HaoSchool of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
Guangjian ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China.
Yuting WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China.
Weifang Medical University · CNWeifang People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent years, radiomics has been increasingly utilized for the differential diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the application of radiomics in PD diagnosis still lacks sufficient evidence-based support. To address this gap, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of radiomics-based machine learning (ML) for PD. Methods: We systematically searched Embase, Cochrane, PubMed, and Web of Science databases as of November 14, 2022. The radiomics quality assessment scale (RQS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The outcome measures were the c-index, which reflects the overall accuracy of the model, as well as sensitivity and specificity. During this meta-analysis, we discussed the differential diagnostic value of radiomics-based ML for Parkinson's disease and various atypical parkinsonism syndromes (APS). Results: Twenty-eight articles with a total of 6,057 participants were included. The mean RQS score for all included articles was 10.64, with a relative score of 29.56%. The pooled c-index, sensitivity, and specificity of radiomics for predicting PD were 0.862 (95% CI: 0.833-0.891), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.94), and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87-0.96) in the training set, and 0.871 (95% CI: 0.853-0.890), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81-0.89), and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83-0.91) in the validation set, respectively. Additionally, the pooled c-index, sensitivity, and specificity of radiomics for differentiating PD from APS were 0.866 (95% CI: 0.843-0.889), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.84-0.88), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75-0.84) in the training set, and 0.879 (95% CI: 0.854-0.903), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.85-0.89), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.86) in the validation set, respectively. Conclusion: Radiomics-based ML can serve as a potential tool for PD diagnosis. Moreover, it has an excellent performance in distinguishing Parkinson's disease from APS. The support vector machine (SVM) model exhibits excellent robustness when the number of samples is relatively abundant. However, due to the diverse implementation process of radiomics, it is expected that more large-scale, multi-class image data can be included to develop radiomics intelligent tools with broader applicability, promoting the application and development of radiomics in the diagnosis and prediction of Parkinson's disease and related fields. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=383197, identifier ID: CRD42022383197.

Indexed as

diagnostic accuracymachine learningmeta-analysisParkinson’s diseaseradiomicssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37484694
PMCPMC10357514
OpenAlexW4383370984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.