ArticleTaiwan journal of ophthalmology
Analysis of accuracy of twelve intraocular lens power calculation formulas for eyes with axial myopia.
Article in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Analysis of Twenty Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Medium-Long Eyes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence driven intraocular lens power calculation in extreme axial myopia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Innovations in Intraocular Lens Power Calculation-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comparing IOL refraction prediction accuracy and A-constant optimization for cataract surgery patients across South Indian and Midwestern United States populations.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Cost-benefit analysis of a trifocal intraocular lens versus a monofocal intraocular lens in South Korea.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effects of toric intraocular lens in cataract patients with axial myopia and regular corneal astigmatism at primary hospitals.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Biometry and keratometry measurements after intracorneal ring segment implantation in keratoconus patients: a pilot comparison between Pentacam AXL and IOL Master 700.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Studying the added effect of sum-of-segments biometry to modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas for short eyes.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Prediction of Seven Artificial Intelligence-Based Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Medium-Long Caucasian Eyes.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Children-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Accuracy of 20 Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Medium-Long Eyes.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Investigation of the myopic outcomes of the newer intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Korean patients with long eyes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to compare twelve intraocular lens power calculation formulas for eyes longer than 25.0 mm in terms of absolute error (AE), the percentage of postoperative emmetropia, and agreement interval in Bland-Altman analysis. MATERIALS AND
methodsData of myopic patients who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification between January 2016 and July 2021 was reviewed. Intraocular lens power was calculated using Holladay 1, SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay 2, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, Hill-RBF, Ladas, Kane, EVO, Pearl-DGS, and K6 formulas. Three months after phacoemulsification, refraction was measured, and mean AE was calculated. The percentage of patients with full visual acuity (VA) without any correction, with ± 0.25D, ±0.5D, ±0.75D, and limits of agreement for each formula were established.
resultsNinety-one patients, whose ocular axial length ranged between 25.03 mm and 28.91 mm, were included in the study. The Barrett Universal II formula achieved the lowest mean AE of 0.11 ± 0.11 (
conclusionThe Barrett Universal II formula is recommended for intraocular lens power calculation for eyeballs with the axial length longer than 25.0 mm. The Kane formula also gives very promising results in regarding the accuracy of intraocular lens power for myopic eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.