Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37484617›Full record

ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology

Use of artificial intelligence in forecasting glaucoma progression.

Sahil Thakur, Linh Le Dinh, Raghavan Lavanya, Ten Cheer Quek, Yong Liu, Ching-Yu Cheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sahil ThakurSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Linh Le DinhInstitute of High Performance Computing, The Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore.
Raghavan LavanyaSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Ten Cheer QuekSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Yong LiuInstitute of High Performance Computing, The Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore.
Ching-Yu ChengSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely used in ophthalmology for disease detection and monitoring progression. For glaucoma research, AI has been used to understand progression patterns and forecast disease trajectory based on analysis of clinical and imaging data. Techniques such as machine learning, natural language processing, and deep learning have been employed for this purpose. The results from studies using AI for forecasting glaucoma progression however vary considerably due to dataset constraints, lack of a standard progression definition and differences in methodology and approach. While glaucoma detection and screening have been the focus of most research that has been published in the last few years, in this narrative review we focus on studies that specifically address glaucoma progression. We also summarize the current evidence, highlight studies that have translational potential, and provide suggestions on how future research that addresses glaucoma progression can be improved.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencedeep learningforecastingglaucomapredictionprogression

Identifiers

PMID37484617
PMCPMC10361424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.