ArticleTaiwan journal of ophthalmology
Five-year outcome of aflibercept intravitreal injection in naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration using a modified treat-and-extend regimen: Results from a prospective observational study.
Article in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging and functional correlates of fibrosis in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Long-term remission and incidence of recurrence of neovascularization in intravitreal injection treated exudative age-related macular degeneration.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- Two-year Outcomes of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration with "Observe before Treat-and-Extend" Method.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2024Article
- Sustained Disease Control in DME Patients upon Treatment Cessation with Brolucizumab.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose is to study the 5-year results of aflibercept monotherapy using an individualized regimen in naïve patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a prospective observational study including naïve nAMD patients who underwent aflibercept injections with at least 5 years of follow-up. All of them received 3 monthly injections at the loading phase, followed by an observation period, then treated with an individualized treat-and-extend regimen. Visual acuity (VA) measurement and optical coherence tomography were performed at each visit.
resultsForty-eight eyes were included. Of these, 30 were followed up for 5 years. The mean follow-up was 61.7 ± 2.3 months. The mean age was 81 ± 8 years. The visual gain was 7.3 ± 12.7 letters at 1 year, 6.5 ± 12.5 letters at 2 years, 5.2 ± 17 letters at 3 years, 6.2 ± 18.6 letters at 4 years, and 5.6 ± 20 letters at 5 years. At the last observation, 53% of eyes had VA > 70 letters. A complete fluid resolution was obtained in 53% of the eyes. At the 5-year endpoint, the total number of injections was 21.6 ± 13.4. Macular atrophy was observed in 18 eyes (60%) and subretinal fibrosis in 14 eyes (46%).
conclusionPatients with exudative AMD can maintain their visual function at 5 years with aflibercept using an individualized treatment. The loss of visual gain beyond 2 years could be related to the natural progression of the disease than the direct effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth injections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.