Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37484606›Full record

ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology

The use of artificial intelligence in detecting papilledema from fundus photographs.

Lazuardiah Anandi, Brigitta Marcia Budihardja, Erika Anggraini, Rona Ali Badjrai, Syntia Nusanti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lazuardiah AnandiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Brigitta Marcia BudihardjaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Erika AnggrainiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Rona Ali BadjraiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Syntia NusantiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Division of Neuro-Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Papilledema is an optic disc swelling with increased intracranial pressure as the underlying cause. Diagnosis of papilledema is made based on ophthalmoscopy findings. Although important, ophthalmoscopy can be challenging for general physicians and nonophthalmic specialists. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to be a useful tool for the detection of fundus abnormalities, including papilledema. Even more, AI might also be useful in grading papilledema. We aim to review the latest advancement in the diagnosis of papilledema using AI and explore its potential. This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. A systematic literature search was performed on four databases (PubMed, Cochrane, ProQuest, and Google Scholar) using the Keywords "AI" and "papilledema" including their synonyms. The literature search identified 372 articles, of which six met the eligibility criteria. Of the six articles included in this review, three articles assessed the use of AI for detecting papilledema, one article evaluated the use of AI for papilledema grading using Frisèn criteria, and two articles assessed the use of AI for both detection and grading. The models for both papilledema detection and grading had shown good diagnostic value, with high sensitivity (83.1%-99.82%), specificity (82.6%-98.65%), and accuracy (85.89%-99.89%). Even though studies regarding the use of AI in papilledema are still limited, AI has shown promising potential for papilledema detection and grading. Further studies will help provide more evidence to support the use of AI in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencefundus photographypapilledema

Identifiers

PMID37484606
PMCPMC10361430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.