Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37484447›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2023

New-Onset Paralysis following Biopsy of a Retroperitoneal Mass with Intraspinal Extension in a Pediatric Patient.

Michelle Wiese, Shankar Rajeswaran

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle WieseDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Shankar RajeswaranDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image-guided percutaneous biopsies are routine, safe procedures and complications are infrequent and usually directly related to the biopsy itself. This report describes a biopsy of a retroperitoneal mass with extension into the spinal canal, following which the patient developed paralysis unrelated to the biopsy itself but secondary to spinal cord ischemia during the procedure. Multiple factors contributed to the ischemia, including prone positioning, compression of spinal vasculature by the mass, low arterial pressures, and an extended duration of anesthesia. While the patient eventually recovered neurologic function, it is an important reminder to consider individual patient factors that may complicate typically routine procedures. In masses with intraspinal extension, patient positioning is critical to prevent positional ischemia, and maintaining elevated mean arterial pressures is crucial for ensuring adequate spinal perfusion throughout the procedure.

Indexed as

paralysisretroperitoneal massspinal cord ischemia

Identifiers

PMID37484447
PMCPMC10359130
OpenAlexW4384946745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.