Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37484314›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Preparing CT imaging datasets for deep learning in lung nodule analysis: Insights from four well-known datasets.

Jingxuan Wang, Nikos Sourlos, Sunyi Zheng, Nils van der Velden, Gert Jan Pelgrim, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Peter van Ooijen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jingxuan WangDepartment of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center of Groningen, 9713GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Nikos SourlosDepartment of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center of Groningen, 9713GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Sunyi ZhengSchool of Engineering, Westlake University, Xihu District, 310030, Hangzhou, China.
Nils van der VeldenDepartment of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center of Groningen, 9713GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Gert Jan PelgrimDepartment of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center of Groningen, 9713GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Rozemarijn VliegenthartDepartment of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center of Groningen, 9713GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Peter van OoijenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center of Groningen, 9713GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep learning is an important means to realize the automatic detection, segmentation, and classification of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography (CT) images. An entire CT scan cannot directly be used by deep learning models due to image size, image format, image dimensionality, and other factors. Between the acquisition of the CT scan and feeding the data into the deep learning model, there are several steps including data use permission, data access and download, data annotation, and data preprocessing. This paper aims to recommend a complete and detailed guide for researchers who want to engage in interdisciplinary lung nodule research of CT images and Artificial Intelligence (AI) engineering.

methodsThe data preparation pipeline used the following four popular large-scale datasets: LIDC-IDRI (Lung Image Database Consortium image collection), LUNA16 (Lung Nodule Analysis 2016), NLST (National Lung Screening Trial) and NELSON (The Dutch-Belgian Randomized Lung Cancer Screening Trial). The dataset preparation is presented in chronological order.

findingsThe different data preparation steps before deep learning were identified. These include both more generic steps and steps dedicated to lung nodule research. For each of these steps, the required process, necessity, and example code or tools for actual implementation are provided. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionDepending on the specific research question, researchers should be aware of the various preparation steps required and carefully select datasets, data annotation methods, and image preprocessing methods. Moreover, it is vital to acknowledge that each auxiliary tool or code has its specific scope of use and limitations. This paper proposes a standardized data preparation process while clearly demonstrating the principles and sequence of different steps. A data preparation pipeline can be quickly realized by following these proposed steps and implementing the suggested example codes and tools.

Indexed as

Data access and downloadData annotationData preprocessingDeep learningLung nodule dataset

Identifiers

PMID37484314
PMCPMC10361226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.