ArticleHeliyon2023
A fast Markovian method for modeling channel noise in neurons.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Channel noise results from rapid transitions of protein channels from closed to open state and is generally considered as the most dominant source of electrical noise causing membrane-potential fluctuations even in the absence of synaptic inputs. The simulation of a realistic channel noise remains a source of possible error. Although the Markovian method is considered as the golden standard for appropriate description of channel noise, its computation time increasing exponentially with the number of channels, it is poorly suitable to simulate realistic features. We describe here a novel algorithm at discrete time unit for simulating ion channel noise based on Markov chains (MC). Although this new algorithm refers to a Monte-Carlo process, it only needs few random numbers whatever the number of channels involved. Our fast MC (FMC) model does not exhibit the drawbacks due to approximations based on stochastic differential equations and the values of spike jitter are comparable to those obtained with the true Markovian method. In fact, we show here, that these drawbacks can be highlighted in the approximation based on stochastic differential equation methods even for a high number of channels (standard deviation of the 5th spike is about two-fold larger than that of MCF or true Markovian method for 5000 sodium channels). The FMC model appears therefore as the most accurate method to simulate channel noise with a fast execution time that does not depend on the channel number.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.