Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37484065›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2023

Oxygen targets following cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema, Arman Shafiee, Amirhossein Akhondi, Niloofar Seighali, Abia Shahid, Mohammad Ebad Ur Rehman, Talal Almas, Sebastian Hadeed, Abdulqadir J Nashwan, Soban Ahmad

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Huzaifa Ahmad CheemaDepartment of Cardiology, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Arman ShafieeClinical Research Development Unit, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Amirhossein AkhondiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Niloofar SeighaliStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Abia ShahidDepartment of Cardiology, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mohammad Ebad Ur RehmanDepartment of Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Talal AlmasDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
Sebastian HadeedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Abdulqadir J NashwanHamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Soban AhmadDepartment of Internal Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Jahrom University of Medical Sciences · IRKing Edward Medical University · PKEast Carolina University · USHamad Medical Corporation · QARawalpindi Medical University · PKRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEUniversity Hospital Galway · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The appropriate oxygen target post-resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients is uncertain. We sought to compare lower versus higher oxygen targets in patients following OHCA. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov until January 2023 to include all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated conservative vs. liberal oxygen therapy in OHCA patients. Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days while our secondary outcomes were the level of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) at 48 h, ICU length of stay (LOS), and favorable neurological outcome (the proportion of patients with Cerebral Performance Category scores of 1-2 at end of follow-up). We used RevMan 5.4 to pool risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs). Results: Nine trials with 1971 patients were included in our review. There was no significant difference between the conservative and liberal oxygen target groups regarding the rate of all-cause mortality (RR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.13; I Conclusions: Conservative oxygen therapy did not decrease mortality, improve neurologic recovery, or decrease ICU LOS as compared to a liberal oxygen regimen. Future large-scale RCTs comparing homogenous oxygen targets are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestHyperoxiaMeta-analysisOxygen

Identifiers

PMID37484065
PMCPMC10359856
OpenAlexW4383213763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.