Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37483957›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Effectiveness of a modified Balint group process on empathy and psychological skills employing Kirkpatrick's evaluation framework.

Jumana Antoun, Beatrice Khater, Hala Itani, Jihane Naous, Maya Romani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Teaching empathy in Balint groups.The Libyan journal of medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Mental Health and Resilience in Nursing Students: A Longitudinal Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jumana Antoun *Family Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0002-2159-427X
Beatrice Khater *Family Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Hala ItaniFamily Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Jihane NaousFamily Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Maya RomaniFamily Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To evaluate, using Kirkpatrick's evaluation model, a modified Balint group (BG) by adding 5-10 min at the end of the session, where the facilitators will debrief the residents about critical themes mentioned in the session. Methods: A quasi-experimental study with a mixed-method design was conducted among family medicine residents over 1 year, using focus groups and validated tools filled by residents and their corresponding patients. The residents' empathy through self and patient evaluation, psychological skills, and satisfaction with the educational activity were measured. Results: The focus group revealed that the residents were aware of the change and considered it a closure to the encounter, helping decrease some uncertainty. Most of the residents did not consider the change helpful. Using validated instruments, BG was ineffective at improving the residents' empathy and psychological skills. There was a statistically significant main effect of time on Psychological Medicine Inventory (PMI) scores, F (1,13) = 7.709, Conclusion: Debriefing at the end of BG by the facilitators about key themes may help give the residents closure, decrease the uncertainty, and make them more aware of their feelings. Nevertheless, Balint groups are still not very well accepted by the residents, and they prefer direct feedback and support groups.

Indexed as

EmpathyGroup ProcessesFamily PracticeFeedbackHumansPersonal SatisfactionBalintEmpathyFamily medicinePost-graduate training

Identifiers

PMID37483957
PMCPMC10362841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.