Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37483927›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in public health2023

Effect of internet-based vs. in-person multimodal interventions on patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, cross-over, open-label trial.

Young Hee Jung, Sang-Cheol Park, Jee Hee Lee, Myong Jong Kim, Seunghoon Lee, Su Jin Chung, Ji Yeon Moon, Young Hi Choi, Jieun Ju, Hyun Jeong Han and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating the Use of Anxiety Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Dementia Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Young Hee JungDepartment of Neurology, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Cheol ParkArtificial Intelligence and Robotics Laboratory, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Jee Hee LeeDepartment of Public Health and Healthcare Service, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Myong Jong KimCenter for Arts and Healing, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Seunghoon LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Su Jin ChungDepartment of Neurology, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Ji Yeon MoonDepartment of Neurology, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Young Hi ChoiCheongpungho Geriatric Hospital, Jecheon, Republic of Korea.
Jieun JuCenter for Arts and Healing, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Jeong HanDepartment of Neurology, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
So Young LeeCenter for Arts and Healing, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Myongji Hospital · KRHyoja Geriatric Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate the effect of internet-based and in-person cognitive interventions on cognition, mood, and activities of daily living (ADL) on patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) and examine whether internet-based intervention is as effective as the in-person intervention. Methods: We recruited 52 patients with probable mild AD, of whom 42 completed the trial. We randomly divided participants into intervention and control groups at a 1:1 ratio and statistically compared the neuropsychological test results of the two groups. In addition, patients in the intervention group were randomly assigned to a 4 weeks internet-based or in-person intervention, with subsequent crossover to the other group for 4 weeks. We statistically analyzed and compared the neuropsychological test scores between internet-based and in-person interventions. Results: Compared with the control group, the intervention group (internet-based and in-person) showed significantly improved profile in cognition ( Conclusion: This study suggests that both types of cognitive intervention (in-person and internet-based) may be viable supplementary treatments along with approved pharmacological therapy. In terms of anxiety and ADL, the effect of the in-person interventions may be more effective than the-internet based interventions.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseActivities of Daily LivingAnxietyCognitionHumansInternetAlzheimer’s diseaseart therapyin-personinternet-basedmultimodal interventionmusic therapy

Identifiers

PMID37483927
PMCPMC10361252
OpenAlexW4383533661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.