Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37483870›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2023

Inside out: transforming images of lab-grown plants for machine learning applications in agriculture.

Alexander E Krosney, Parsa Sotoodeh, Christopher J Henry, Michael A Beck, Christopher P Bidinosti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexander E KrosneyDepartment of Computer Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Parsa SotoodehDepartment of Applied Computer Science, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Christopher J HenryDepartment of Applied Computer Science, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Michael A BeckDepartment of Applied Computer Science, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Christopher P BidinostiDepartment of Physics, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Machine learning tasks often require a significant amount of training data for the resultant network to perform suitably for a given problem in any domain. In agriculture, dataset sizes are further limited by phenotypical differences between two plants of the same genotype, often as a result of different growing conditions. Synthetically-augmented datasets have shown promise in improving existing models when real data is not available. Methods: In this paper, we employ a contrastive unpaired translation (CUT) generative adversarial network (GAN) and simple image processing techniques to translate indoor plant images to appear as field images. While we train our network to translate an image containing only a single plant, we show that our method is easily extendable to produce multiple-plant field images. Results: Furthermore, we use our synthetic multi-plant images to train several YoloV5 nano object detection models to perform the task of plant detection and measure the accuracy of the model on real field data images. Discussion: The inclusion of training data generated by the CUT-GAN leads to better plant detection performance compared to a network trained solely on real data.

Indexed as

agriculture 4.0convolutional neural networksdata augmentationdeep learningdigital agriculturegenerative adversarial networksimage augmentation

Identifiers

PMID37483870
PMCPMC10358354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.