ArticleCentral European journal of urology2023
Efficacy of combined organ-sparing management of invasive upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Evaluation of DeepSeek-R1 and ChatGPT-4o as educational sources for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.Central European journal of urology · 2026Article
- Article
- Urothelial cancer: state of art in Ukraine and improvement pathways.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The study aimed to evaluate the objective response level to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and tumour complexity reduction in patients with invasive upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC), and to estimate the functional and oncological outcomes of the combined organ-sparing approach compared to radical nephroureterectomy. Material and methods: This prospective, non-randomised cohort study was conducted by the National Cancer Institute of Ukraine. Patients with invasive UTUC were enrolled between October 2016 and January 2021. Patients were allocated to one of two cohorts depending on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of the affected kidney. In cases where eGFR was preserved, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with an organ-sparing approach was used; all other cases proceeded directly to radical nephroureterectomy. Results: A total of 64 patients (32 in each cohort) with invasive UTUC were enrolled. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, T stage, maximal tumour size, eGFR, Eastern Cooperation Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, body mass Index (BMI), and haemoglobin level. After four cycles of chemotherapy, there were no cases of progressive disease, stable disease [16 (50%), partial response; 12 (38%); and complete response, 4 (12%)]. The average maximal tumour size decreased by 2.3 cm. Prior to surgical treatment, total GFR according to scintigraphy did not statistically differ in both groups (р = 0.13). However, 3 months after surgery patients who underwent the organ-sparing approach had a better total eGFR (р = 0.0039), which was probably owing to the preserved kidney function (18.9 +5.1 mL/min). Better 2-year recurrence-free survival was also observed in the organ-sparing management group (85% vs 72%, log-rank test; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy reduces the surgical complexity of invasive UTUC without influencing the safety profile. The gemcitabine/cisplatin regimen leads to high regression rates among invasive UTUC, which could result in an organ-sparing approach in selected cases. Kidney function preservation remains a key parameter that can increase the possibility of effective systemic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.