ArticleCentral European journal of urology2023
Polish version of the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score for patients with acute uncomplicated cystitis.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS) is a self-reporting questionnaire to evaluate the symptoms and quality of life in women with uncomplicated acute cystitis (AC). The aim of the current study was the additional cognitive and clinical validation of the Polish version. Material and methods: Professional forward and backward translations from original Russian to Polish were performed by Mapi SAS. For cognitive assessment, women with different ages and educational levels were asked to comment on each item of the Polish ACSS to establish the final study version. The clinical validation was performed as a prospective, non-interventional cohort study. Women with AC (Patients) and those without (Controls) filled in the Polish ACSS during their visits to a physician's office and at a follow-up visit. Statistical analysis included ordinary descriptive values, calculation of reliability, validity, discriminative ability, responsiveness (sensitivity, specificity), and comparative analysis. Results: The cognitive assessment was performed in 60 women with a median (range) age of 44.5 (21-88) years and different educational levels: grade school (n = 8), high school (n = 25), college (n = 22), and postgraduate education (n = 5). Forty-three patients were recruited for the clinical validation study along with 34 controls. Statistical analyses resulted in excellent values of internal consistency, discriminative ability, and validity for diagnosis of AC. At a summary score of 6 and higher in the ´Typical´ domain, positive and negative predictive values were 97% and 79%, and sensitivity and specificity were 79% and 97%, respectively. Conclusions: The Polish version of the ACSS has demonstrated benefits for diagnosis and patient-reported outcome assessment. It is objective, fast, and cost-effective, and it may help to easily confirm the accurate diagnosis of AC. The Polish ASCSS can now be recommended for use in clinical and epidemiological studies, in clinical practice, or for self-diagnosis and patient-reported outcome in women with symptoms of AC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.