ArticleHeliyon2023
Impact of water as raw material on material circularity - A case study from the Hungarian food sector.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measuring circularity is necessary to prove the feasibility of transforming linear technologies into circular ones. However, most of the circular economic researches consider water only as a medium. Food industry processes are excellent examples of systems that are hard to break free from linearity, albeit not impossible. This paper explores solutions to include water in circularity calculations using a Hungarian poultry processing plant as a case study. Two circular economic indicators, the questionnaire-type Circular Economy Indicator Prototype (CEIP) and the product-centric Material Circularity Indicator (MCI and MCI') and the Water Footprint were examined in detail and modified to fit the needs of assessing circularity with water included as raw material. The calculations were supported by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The impact on circularity and the environment were quantified by considering different reuse scenarios. As the results of CEIP show, including water reuse in the technology or recycling for irrigation could increase the indicator values from low to medium-high level of circularity. However, the level of improvement highly depends on the amount of water used. LCA highlighted the significant environmental effects of packaging (<2% of product mass) and the relative benefits of recycling and reuse. The MCI' values (including water as raw material) increased from 0.171 to 0.848 when water demand was reduced by 50% and 100% reused within the processes. This led to a reduction of 76% in the environmental effect. On the other hand, Water Footprint analysis showed that 99% of the water is incorporated in the product itself; therefore, technological water consumption should be treated separately from broiler breeding. The results show that a fairly linear process can be directed towards circularity. However, environmental benefits are not guaranteed with higher circularity points, and recycling may lead to unexpected results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.