Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37483774›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Individual modelling of haematotoxicity with NARX neural networks: A knowledge transfer approach.

Marie Steinacker, Yuri Kheifetz, Markus Scholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marie SteinackerCenter for Scalable Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (ScaDS.AI) Dresden/Leipzig, Leipzig University, Germany.
Yuri KheifetzLeipzig University, Medical Faculty, Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), Germany.
Markus ScholzLeipzig University, Medical Faculty, Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytotoxic cancer therapy often results in dose-limiting haematotoxic side effects. Predicting an individual's risk is a major objective in precision medicine of cancer treatment. In this regard, patient heterogeneity presents a significant challenge. In this paper, we explore the use of hypothesis-free machine learning models based on recurrent nonlinear auto-regressive networks with exogenous inputs (NARX) as an approach to achieve this goal. Also, we propose a knowledge transfer approach to ameliorate the issue of sparse individual data, which typically hampers learning of individual networks. We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach based on a virtual patient population generated using a semi-mechanistic model of haematopoiesis and imposing different cytotoxic therapy scenarios on it. Employing different techniques of model optimisation, we derive robust and parsimonious individual networks with good generalisation performances. Moreover, we analyse in detail possible factors influencing the generalisation performance. Results suggest that our transfer learning approach using NARX networks can provide robust predictions of individual patient's response to treatment. As a practical perspective, we apply our approach to individual time series data of two patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Indexed as

HaematopoiesisPrecision medicineRecurrent neural networksSystem identificationTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37483774
PMCPMC10362198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.