ArticleHeliyon2023
Should ICSI be implemented on patients with poor-quality embryos in the previous IVF cycle?
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- ICSI shows no advantage over conventional IVF in patients with unexpected low oocyte yield.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Does the transfer of a poor-quality embryo along with a good-quality embryo influence the intracytoplasmic sperm injection embryo transfer outcomes? A cross-sectional study.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2026Article
- Correlation analysis of a novel artificial intelligence optical microscope-assisted semen assessment system with IVF outcomes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was to evaluate whether Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) can improve the quality of embryo in patients with poor-quality embryos in the previous In-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle, which was cancelled before transfer. This was a retrospective cohort study of 178 IVF and 158 ICSI cycles for patients with poor-quality embryos in the previous IVF cycle in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from March 2016 to June 2022. The 2 PN rate, oocyte utilization rate , high-quality embryo rate and clinical pregnancy rate were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, the implantation rate, miscarriage rate and cycle cancelation rate were measured and compared. ICSI resulted in a comparable 2 PN rate, oocyte utilization rate and cycle cancelation rate with IVF. The high-quality embryo rate of ICSI group was significantly higher than that of IVF group (5.56% vs. 2.60%, P < 0.05). Eventually, a total of 239 patients performed embryo transfer. ICSI resulted in a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (55.56% vs. 40.98%, P < 0.05) compared with IVF, however, there were no notable differences in miscarriage rate and implantation rate. The present study suggested that ICSI significantly improved the high-quality embryo rate and clinical pregnancy of the patients with poor-quality embryos in the previous IVF cycle. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to further verify.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.