ArticleHeliyon2023
Improving the hospital waste management at the Farabi hospital in Malekan -Iran: An action research study.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lean Six Sigma for Sharps Waste Management and Occupational Biosafety in Emergency Care Units.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hospital waste poses numerous concerns for both human health and the environment. Using an action research technique, this study attempts to improve waste management at the Farabi Hospital in Malekan city-Iran. In 2020, integrated (quantitative-qualitative) action research was done. For action research, the Simmons model was employed. First, a list of significant issues was found during the waste management process evaluation using a standard checklist and brainstorming with hospital officials and workers. The identified issues were prioritized using a prioritization matrix. Then, after consulting with hospital officials, 11 interventions were designed and implemented over six months. Finally, waste management performance was re-evaluated. Average knowledge of the participants about hospital waste management (HWM) standards was improved significantly (64 ± 13.8 before the training, 84.6 ± 20.6). General waste production was reduced by 27.7% in terms of garbage bags and 23.4% in terms of waste weight (95.5 kg-73.1 kg), respectively. Infectious waste output was reduced by 22.8% in the number of garbage bags and 32.1% in the weight of waste (57.5 kg-39 kg). The rate of compliance with HWM criteria was improved from 10 to 33 items. Although the interventions in this study improved the HWM to an acceptable level, more interventions and ongoing monitoring are required. The study's findings also show that an action research strategy might address a wide range of issues and weaknesses in hospitals and related facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.