ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023
Interrogation of human microglial phagocytosis by CRISPR genome editing.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modelling Ferroptosis in a Human Microglial Line by Sequential Exposure to Iron and GPX4 Inhibition.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2026Article
- HMC3 revealed: how much do these "Microglia" really tell us?Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Targeting Microglial Phagocytosis for Alzheimer's Disease Management: Natural, Pharmacological, Nanoparticle, and Gene Therapy Approaches.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2026Review
- Phagocytosis Checkpoints in Glioblastoma: CD47 and Beyond.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Taming microglia: the promise of engineered microglia in treating neurological diseases.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Microglia are an integral part of central nervous system, but our understanding of microglial biology is limited due to the challenges in obtaining and culturing primary human microglia. HMC3 is an important cell line for studying human microglia because it is readily accessible and straightforward to maintain in standard laboratories. Although HMC3 is widely used for microglial research, a robust genetic method has not been described. Here, we report a CRISPR genome editing platform, by the electroporation of Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (Cas9 RNP) and synthetic DNA repair templates, to enable rapid and precise genetic modifications of HMC3. For proof-of-concept demonstrations, we targeted the genes implicated in the regulation of amyloid beta (Aβ) and glioblastoma phagocytosis in microglia. We showed that CRISPR genome editing could enhance the phagocytic activities of HMC3. Methods: We performed CRISPR gene knockout (KO) in HMC3 by the electroporation of pre-assembled Cas9 RNP. Co-introduction of DNA repair templates allowed site-specific knock-in (KI) of an epitope tag, a synthetic promoter and a fluorescent reporter gene. The editing efficiencies were determined genotypically by DNA sequencing and phenotypically by immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometry. The gene-edited HMC3 cells were examined Results: Our platform enabled robust single (>90%) and double (>70%) KO without detectable off-target editing by high throughput DNA sequencing. We also inserted a synthetic SFFV promoter to efficiently upregulate the expression of endogenous Conclusion: CRISPR genome editing by Cas9 RNP electroporation is a robust approach to genetically modify HMC3 for functional studies such as the interrogation of Aβ and tumor phagocytosis, and is readily adoptable to investigate other aspects of microglial biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.