Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37483495›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Molecular profiling of solid tumors by next-generation sequencing: an experience from a clinical laboratory.

Pratibha Bhai, Jacob Turowec, Stephanie Santos, Jennifer Kerkhof, LeeAnne Pickard, Aidin Foroutan, Daniel Breadner, Matthew Cecchini, Michael A Levy, Alan Stuart and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pratibha BhaiMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Jacob TurowecMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Stephanie SantosMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Jennifer KerkhofMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
LeeAnne PickardDepartment of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Aidin ForoutanVerspeeten Clinical Genome Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Daniel BreadnerDepartment of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Matthew CecchiniMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Michael A LevyMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Alan StuartMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Stephen WelchDepartment of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Christopher HowlettDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Hanxin LinMolecular Genetics Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Bekim SadikovicMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
London Health Sciences Centre · CAWestern University · CAProvincial Laboratory of Public Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Personalized targeted therapies have transformed management of several solid tumors. Timely and accurate detection of clinically relevant genetic variants in tumor is central to the implementation of molecular targeted therapies. To facilitate precise molecular testing in solid tumors, targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays have emerged as a valuable tool. In this study, we provide an overview of the technical validation, diagnostic yields, and spectrum of variants observed in 3,164 solid tumor samples that were tested as part of the standard clinical diagnostic assessment in an academic healthcare institution over a period of 2 years. Methods: The Ion Ampliseq™ Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 assay (ThermoFisher) that targets ~2,800 COSMIC mutations from 50 oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes was validated, and a total of 3,164 tumor DNA samples were tested in 2 years. A total of 500 tumor samples were tested by the comprehensive panel containing all the 50 genes. Other samples, including 1,375 lung cancer, 692 colon cancer, 462 melanoma, and 135 brain cancer, were tested by tumor-specific targeted subpanels including a few clinically actionable genes. Results: Of 3,164 patient samples, 2,016 (63.7%) tested positive for at least one clinically relevant variant. Of 500 samples tested by a comprehensive panel, 290 had a clinically relevant variant with TP53, KRAS, and PIK3CA being the most frequently mutated genes. The diagnostic yields in major tumor types were as follows: breast (58.4%), colorectal (77.6%), lung (60.4%), pancreatic (84.6%), endometrial (72.4%), ovary (57.1%), and thyroid (73.9%). Tumor-specific targeted subpanels also demonstrated high diagnostic yields: lung (69%), colon (61.2%), melanoma (69.7%), and brain (20.7%). Co-occurrence of mutations in more than one gene was frequently observed. Conclusions: The findings of our study demonstrate the feasibility of integrating an NGS-based gene panel screen as part of a standard diagnostic protocol for solid tumor assessment. High diagnostic rates enable significant clinical impact including improved diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management in patients with solid tumors.

Indexed as

colon cancerlung cancermelanomaNGSsolid tumor

Identifiers

PMID37483495
PMCPMC10359709
OpenAlexW4383313483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.