Article3 Biotech2023
Improvement of binding pose prediction of the MR1 covalent ligands by inclusion of simple pharmacophore constraints and structural waters in the docking process.
Article in 3 Biotech, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-related molecule, MR1, is a key component of the immune system, presenting antigens to T-cell receptors (TCRs) and modulating the immune response against various antigens. MR1 possesses a compact ligand-binding pocket despite its ability to interact with ligands that can have either agonistic or antagonistic effects on the immune system. Agonistic ligands can stimulate the immune response, while antagonistic ligands do not elicit an immune response. In most cases, ligand binding to MR1 is mediated through a covalent bond with Lys43. However, recent studies have suggested that a variety of small molecules can interact with the MR1-binding site. In this study, we have used several approaches to improve the binding pose prediction of covalent ligands to MR1, including docking in mutated receptors, and imposing simple pharmacophore constraints and structural water molecules. The careful assignment of pharmacophore constraints and inclusion of structural water molecules in the challenging docking process of covalent docking improved the binding pose prediction and virtual screening performance. In a retrospective virtual screening, the proposed approach exhibited EF1% and EF2% values of 7.4 and 5.5, respectively. Conversely, when using the mutated receptor, both EF1% and EF2% were recorded as 0 for the conventional docking method. The performance of the pharmacophore constraints was also evaluated on other covalent docking cases, and compared to previously reported results for common covalent docking methods. The proposed approach achieved an average RMSD of 2.55, while AutoDock4, CovDock, FITTED, GOLD, ICM-Pro, and MOE exhibited average RMSD values of 3.0, 2.93, 3.04, 4.93, 2.44, and 3.36, respectively. Our results demonstrate that the inclusion of simple pharmacophore constraints and structural waters can improve the prediction of binding poses of covalent ligands to MR1, which can aid in the discovery of novel immunotherapeutic agents. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-023-03694-w.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.