ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Microsurgical revascularization of a symptomatic proximal vertebral artery: pilot experiences from a single center.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retrograde endovascular recanalization via the ascending cervical artery for non-conical stump vertebral artery occlusion: a case report.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Vertebral endarterectomy combined with endovascular treatment for patients with vertebral artery stenosis and vertebral aneurysm: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vertebral artery stenosis and occlusion (VASO) is a high-risk factor for posterior circulation stroke. Post-stent restenosis and drug tolerance have facilitated the exploration of microsurgical vascular reconstruction. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of microsurgical reconstruction of the proximal VA. Methods: Twenty-nine patients (25 men, aged 63.2 years) who had symptoms of posterior circulation ischemia underwent microsurgical revascularization for proximal VASO were retrospectively included in this study. Procedural complications and clinical and angiographic outcomes were reviewed. Results: Twelve, three, and five patients underwent VA endarterectomy, artery transposition, or both, respectively; seven patients underwent vertebral endarterectomy plus stent implantation; and two patients failed surgery because of the difficult exposure of the VA and the occurrence of vascular dissection. The perioperative period-related complications included seven cases of Horner's syndrome, five cases of hoarseness, and one case of chylothorax. No cases of perioperative stroke or death were reported. The mean follow-up period was 28.4 (8-62 months). Most patients improved clinically; however, the vertebrobasilar ischemia symptoms did not decrease significantly in two patients during the follow-up. Moreover, follow-up imaging was performed in all the patients, and no signs of anastomotic stenosis were reported. Conclusion: Microsurgical reconstruction is an alternative option that can effectively treat refractory proximal VASO disease and in-stent stenosis, with a high rate of postoperative vascular recirculation. Prospective cohort studies with larger sample sizes must be conducted to validate the above conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.