Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37483362›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2023

Academic health sciences libraries' outreach and engagement with North American Indigenous communities: a scoping review.

Allison Cruise, Alexis Ellsworth-Kopkowski, A Nydia Villezcas, Jonathan Eldredge, Melissa L Rethlefsen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allison Cruiseallison91b@gmail.com, Health Sciences Library & Informatics Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1156-3365
Alexis Ellsworth-KopkowskiAEllsworthKopkowski@salud.unm.edu, Health Sciences Library & Informatics Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4197-5002
A Nydia VillezcasAVillezcas@salud.unm.edu, College of Population Health, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5821-7507
Jonathan EldredgeJEldredge@salud.unm.edu, Health Sciences Library & Informatics Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3132-9450
Melissa L Rethlefsenmlrethlefsen@gmail.com, Health Sciences Library & Informatics Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5322-9368

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We sought to identify trends and themes in how academic health sciences libraries in the United States, Canada, and Mexico have supported engagement and outreach with Native Americans, Alaska Natives, First Nations, and Indigenous peoples, in or from those same countries. We also sought to learn and share effective practices for libraries engaging with these communities. Methods: We conducted a scoping review utilizing Arksey and O'Malley's framework for scoping reviews and followed principles from JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. We searched seven bibliographic databases, E-LIS (Eprints in Library and Information Science repository), and multiple sources of grey literature. Results were screened using Covidence and Google Sheets. We reported our review according to the PRISMA and PRISMA-S guidelines. We determined types of interventions used by academic health sciences libraries in engagement with our included populations, the level of public participation reached by these interventions, what partnerships were established, and what practices emerged. Results: Database searching returned 2,020 unique results. Additional searching resulted in 211 further unique results. Full text screening of relevant articles found 65 reports meeting criteria for inclusion. Data extraction was conducted on these programs to identify partners, intervention type, and evaluation method. The programs were categorized using the IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation. Conclusion: Our scoping review found that many programs were health information trainings and did not move beyond informing the public with little further involvement. The need for sustained funding, greater community participation and more publishing on engagement and outreach are discussed.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationCanadaHumansNorth Americaacademic health sciences librariescommunity engagementIndigenous populationsoutreachpublic participationScoping review

Identifiers

PMID37483362
PMCPMC10361548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.