Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37483345›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Learning from pseudo-labels: deep networks improve consistency in longitudinal brain volume estimation.

Geng Zhan, Dongang Wang, Mariano Cabezas, Lei Bai, Kain Kyle, Wanli Ouyang, Michael Barnett, Chenyu Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Deep Learning Framework for Automated MRI Planimetry in Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. BrainLossNet: a fast, accurate and robust method to estimate brain volume loss from longitudinal MRI.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Geng ZhanBrain and Mind Center, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Dongang WangBrain and Mind Center, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mariano CabezasBrain and Mind Center, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lei BaiShanghai AI Laboratory, Shanghai, China.
Kain KyleBrain and Mind Center, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Wanli OuyangShanghai AI Laboratory, Shanghai, China.
Michael BarnettBrain and Mind Center, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Chenyu WangBrain and Mind Center, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
University of Sydney · AUCooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology · AUShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Brain atrophy is a critical biomarker of disease progression and treatment response in neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Confounding factors such as inconsistent imaging acquisitions hamper the accurate measurement of brain atrophy in the clinic. This study aims to develop and validate a robust deep learning model to overcome these challenges; and to evaluate its impact on the measurement of disease progression. Methods: Voxel-wise pseudo-atrophy labels were generated using SIENA, a widely adopted tool for the measurement of brain atrophy in MS. Deformation maps were produced for 195 pairs of longitudinal 3D T1 scans from patients with MS. A 3D U-Net, namely DeepBVC, was specifically developed overcome common variances in resolution, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast ratio between baseline and follow up scans. The performance of DeepBVC was compared against SIENA using McLaren test-retest dataset and 233 in-house MS subjects with MRI from multiple time points. Clinical evaluation included disability assessment with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and traditional imaging metrics such as lesion burden. Results: For 3 subjects in test-retest experiments, the median percent brain volume change (PBVC) for DeepBVC and SIENA was 0.105 vs. 0.198% (subject 1), 0.061 vs. 0.084% (subject 2), 0.104 vs. 0.408% (subject 3). For testing consistency across multiple time points in individual MS subjects, the mean (± standard deviation) PBVC difference of DeepBVC and SIENA were 0.028% (± 0.145%) and 0.031% (±0.154%), respectively. The linear correlation with baseline T2 lesion volume were Discussion: DeepBVC is a deep learning powered brain volume change estimation method for assessing brain atrophy used T1-weighted images. Compared to SIENA, DeepBVC demonstrates superior performance in reproducibility and in the context of common clinical scan variances such as imaging contrast, voxel resolution, random bias field, and signal-to-noise ratio. Enhanced measurement robustness, automation, and processing speed of DeepBVC indicate its potential for utilisation in both research and clinical environments for monitoring disease progression and, potentially, evaluating treatment effectiveness.

Indexed as

atrophy measurementbrain volume changedeep learninglongitudinal analysisMRImultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID37483345
PMCPMC10358358
OpenAlexW4383377619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.