Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37483243›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

Effect of Infill Patterns with Machine Learning Techniques on the Tensile Properties of Polylactic Acid-Based Ceramic Materials with Fused Filament Fabrication.

Ranganath Lolla, Adusumilli Srinath, Murali Govindarajan, Manickam Murugan, Elumalai Perumal Venkatesan, Nasim Hasan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ranganath LollaResearch Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram, Vijayawada, A.P. 520002, India.
Adusumilli SrinathDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Principal of Academics staff college, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram, Vijayawada, A.P. 520002, India.
Murali GovindarajanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh 520002, India.
Manickam MuruganDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Aditya College of Engineering and Technology, Surampalem, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh 533437, India.
Elumalai Perumal VenkatesanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Aditya Engineering College, Surampalem, Andhra Pradesh 533437, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7536-8200
Nasim HasanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Mattu University, Metu 524413, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-2767
Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation · INAditya Birla (India) · INEthiopian Civil Service University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of additive manufacturing is quickly evolving from prototyping to manufacturing. Researchers are looking for the best parameters to boost mechanical strength as the demand for three-dimensional (3D) printers grows. The goal of this research is to find the best infill pattern settings for a polylactic acid (PLA)-based ceramic material with a universal testing machine; the impact of significant printing considerations was investigated. An X-ray diffractometer and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy with an attachment of scanning electron microscopy were used to investigate the crystalline structure and microstructure of PLA-based ceramic materials. Tensile testing of PLA-based ceramics using a dog bone specimen was printed with various patterns, as per ASTM D638-10. The cross pattern had a high strength of 16.944 MPa, while the tri-hexagon had a peak intensity of 16.108 MPa. Cross3D and cubic subdivisions have values of 4.802 and 4.803 MPa, respectively. Incorporating the machine learning concepts in this context is to predict the optimal infill pattern for robust strength and other mechanical properties of the PLA-based ceramic model. It helps to rally the precision and efficacy of the procedure by automating the job that would entail substantial physical effort. Implementing the machine learning technique to this work produced the output as cross and tri-hexagon are the efficient ones out of the 13 patterns compared.

Identifiers

PMID37483243
PMCPMC10357419
OpenAlexW4383032979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.