Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37482940›Full record

Trial reportEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Three-year outcomes of A Randomized Multicentre Trial Comparing Revascularization and Optimal Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions (EuroCTO).

Gerald S Werner, David Hildick-Smith, Victoria Martin Yuste, Nicolas Boudou, Georgios Sianos, Valery Gelev, Jose Ramon Rumoroso, Andrejs Erglis, Evald Hoj Christiansen, Javier Escaned and 6 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01760083 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Multicentre Trial to Evaluate the Utilization of Revascularization or Optimal Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions

TypeinterventionalSponsorEuro CTO ClubRan2013 to 2018Enrolled450ConditionsChronic Stable Angina, Dyspnea, Coronary OcclusionArmsBiolimus-eluting stent implantation
NCT07020858 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Value of FAPI Imaging for the Prediction of Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Artery Disease (FACT-2 Trial)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorLin ZhaoRan2025 to 2027Enrolled470ConditionsChronic Total Occlusion (CTO), Chronic Coronary SyndromeArmsFAPl lmaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Electrocardiographic Changes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Gerald S WernerKlinikum Darmstadt GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.
David Hildick-SmithBrighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK.
Victoria Martin YusteInterventional Cardiology, CH Angoulême, Angoulême, France.
Nicolas BoudouInterventional Cardiology, Clinique Saint Augustin, Bordeaux, France.
Georgios SianosAHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Valery GelevMHAT Tokuda Hospital Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Jose Ramon RumorosoHospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao, Spain.
Andrejs ErglisPauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Evald Hoj ChristiansenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Javier EscanedHospital Clinico San Carlos IdISSC, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Carlo Di MarioDepartment of Cardiology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Luis TeruelBellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Alexander BufeHelios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany.
Bernward LauerMedizinische Klinik 1, Klinikum der Friedrich-Schiller Universität, Jena, Germany.
Alfredo Ruggero GalassiDepartment of Cardiology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Yves LouvardHôpital privé Jacques Cartier, Massy, France.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKAHEPA University Hospital · GRBellvitge University Hospital · ESHelios Klinikum Krefeld · DEHôpital Privé Jacques Cartier · FRHospital de Galdakao · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ESKlinikum Darmstadt · DEPauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital · LVUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) improves clinical symptoms and quality of life. The longer-term safety of PCI compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) remains uncertain.

aimsWe sought to evaluate the long-term safety of PCI for CTO in a randomised trial as compared to OMT.

methodsA total of 396 patients with a symptomatic CTO were enrolled into a randomised, multicentre clinical trial comparing PCI and OMT. Half of the patients had a single CTO; the others had multivessel disease. Non-CTO lesions were treated prior to randomisation (2:1 ratio). During follow-up, crossover from OMT to PCI occurred in 7.3% (1 year) and 17.5% (3 years) of patients.

resultsAt 3 years, the incidence of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction was not significantly different between the groups (OMT 3.7% vs PCI 6.2%; p=0.29). By per-protocol analysis, the difference remained non-significant (OMT 5.7% vs PCI 4.7%; p=0.67). Overall, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were more frequent with OMT (OMT 21.2% vs PCI 11.2%), largely because of ischaemia-driven revascularisation. The rates of stroke or hospitalisation for bleeding were not different between the groups.

conclusionsAt 3 years there was no difference in the rate of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction between PCI or OMT among patients with a remaining single coronary CTO. The MACE rate was higher in the OMT group due largely to ischaemia-driven revascularisation. CTO PCI appears to be a safe option for patients with a single remaining significant coronary CTO. CinicalTrials.gov: NCT01760083.

Indexed as

Coronary OcclusionMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionChronic DiseaseHumansQuality of LifeRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID37482940
PMCPMC10493774
OpenAlexW4385186131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.