Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37482581›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Features of the response to subchronic low-dose exposure to copper oxide nanoparticles in rats.

Marina P Sutunkova, Yuliya V Ryabova, Ilzira A Minigalieva, Tatiana V Bushueva, Renata R Sakhautdinova, Ivan A Bereza, Daria R Shaikhova, Anna M Amromina, Aleksei I Chemezov, Ivan G Shelomencev and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Copper Toxicity in Animals: A Review.Biological trace element research · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marina P SutunkovaYekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, 30 Popov Street, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620014.
Yuliya V RyabovaYekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, 30 Popov Street, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620014.
Ilzira A MinigalievaYekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, 30 Popov Street, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620014.
Tatiana V BushuevaYekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, 30 Popov Street, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620014.
Renata R SakhautdinovaYekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, 30 Popov Street, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620014.
Ivan A BerezaYekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, 30 Popov Street, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620014.
Daria R ShaikhovaYekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, 30 Popov Street, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620014.
Anna M AmrominaYekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, 30 Popov Street, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620014.
Aleksei I ChemezovYekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, 30 Popov Street, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620014.
Ivan G ShelomencevYekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, 30 Popov Street, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620014.
Lev A AmrominYekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, 30 Popov Street, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620014.
Irene E ValaminaUral State Medical University, 2 Repin Street, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620014.
Liubov V ToropovaLaboratory of Mathematical Modeling of Physical and Chemical Processes in Multiphase Media, Ural Federal University, 51 Lenin Ave, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620000. liubov.toropova@uni-jena.de.
Ekaterinburg Research Institute of Viral Infections · RUUral Federal University · RUUral State Medical University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copper is an essential trace element for human health and, at the same time, a major industrial metal widely used both in its elemental form and in compounds. We conducted a dose-dependent assessment of the response of outbred albino male rats to subchronic low-dose exposure to copper oxide nanoparticles administered intraperitoneally at cumulative doses of 18 and 36 mg/kg during 6 weeks to exposure groups 1 and 2, respectively. We observed disorders at different levels of organization of the body in the exposed animals, from molecular to organismal. The observed decrease in the activity of succinate dehydrogenase in nucleated blood cells gave evidence of impaired bioenergetics processes. In view of the results of the metabolomics analysis, we assume mitochondrial damage and contribution of apoptotic processes to the pathology induced by copper poisoning. We also assume neurodegenerative effects based on the assessed morphological parameters of the nervous system, results of behavioral tests, and a decreased level of expression of genes encoding NMDA receptor subunits in the hippocampus. The hepatotoxic effect noted by a number of metabolomics-based, biochemical, and cytological indicators was manifested by the impaired protein-synthesizing function of the liver and enhanced degenerative processes in its cells. We also observed a nephrotoxic effect of nanosized copper oxide with a predominant lesion of proximal kidney tubules. At the same time, both doses tested demonstrated such positive health effects as a statistically significant decrease in the activity of alkaline phosphatase and the nucleated blood cell DNA fragmentation factor. Judging by the changes observed, the cumulative dose of copper oxide nanoparticles of 18 mg/kg body weight administered intraperitoneally approximates the threshold one for rats. The established markers of health impairments may serve as a starting point in the development of techniques of early diagnosis of copper poisoning.

Indexed as

CopperNanoparticlesAnimalsHumansMetalsOxidesRatsCoppercuprous oxideMetalsOxides

Identifiers

PMID37482581
PMCPMC10363540
OpenAlexW4385174652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.