ArticleEuropean journal of hybrid imaging2023
FDG-PET/CT for lymph node staging prior to radical cystectomy.
Article in European journal of hybrid imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Diagnostic efficacy of [Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Synergy of PET and MR imaging in the local and regional staging of bladder cancer.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background
objectiveOur aim was to assess the accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for lymph node staging ascertained at the multidisciplinary tumour board compared to lymph node status in the surgical lymphadenectomy specimen obtained at RC, and to explore potential factors associated with false-positive FDG-PET/CT results. DESIGN, SETTING AND
participantsConsecutive patients with bladder cancer undergoing RC with extended lymph node dissection between 2011 and 2019 without preoperative chemotherapy in a tertial referral cystectomy unit were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated. Potential factors investigated for association with false-positive FDG-PET/CT were; bacteriuria within four weeks prior to FDG-PET/CT, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) treatment within 12 months prior to FDG-PET/CT and transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURB) within four weeks prior to FDG-PET/CT.
resultsAmong 157 patients included for analysis, 44 (28%) were clinically node positive according to FDG-PET/CT. The sensitivity and specificity for detection of lymph node metastasis were 50% and 84%, respectively, and the corresponding positive predictive and negative predictive values were 61% and 76%. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.0 and 0.6, respectively. No association was found between bacteriuria, previous BCG treatment or TURB within 28 days and false-positive FDG-PET/CT results.
conclusionsPreoperative FDG-PET/CT prior to RC had a clinically meaningful high specificity (84%) but lower sensitivity (50%) for detection of lymph node metastases compared to lymph node status in an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy template. We could not identify any factors associated with false-positive FDG-PET/CT outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.