Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37482056›Full record

ArticleOncology research and treatment2023

Health Economic Aspects of Platelet Concentrates: Comparing Cost and Reimbursement of Pathogen Inactivated and Conventional Platelet Concentrates in a German Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Jennifer Bonn, Christoph T Baltin, Viola Osterkamp, Christof Scheid, Udo Holtick, Johannes Irsch, Florian Kron

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 65% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer BonnVITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany.
Christoph T BaltinVITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany.
Viola OsterkampVITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany.
Christof ScheidDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Udo HoltickDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Johannes IrschCerus Europe B.V., Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Florian KronVITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEFOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management · DEQUIRIS Healthcare · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPathogen inactivation (PI) utilizing amotosalen and UVA light (INTERCEPT® Blood System) is a well-established method for the production of safer platelet concentrates (PCs). While many studies describe clinical and logistical benefits of PI, the implications and potential challenges from a hospital management perspective have not yet been analyzed - health economic analyses considering reimbursement of PI are lacking. The objective of this analysis was to examine the real-life inpatient treatment costs from a hospital perspective and to assess the economic impact of PI-PC versus conventional PC (CONV-PC) administration in Germany.

methodsReal-life cost data for inpatient cancer cases from 2020 of the University Hospital Cologne were identified by operating and procedure codes. The German diagnosis-related groups, extra fees, case mix index (CMI), length of stay (LOS), and average resource consumption of PC were evaluated from a micro-management perspective. The potential economic impact of implementing PI-treated PCs was modeled retrospectively.

resultsIn total, 951 inpatient cases were analyzed (CMI [median 4.7-9.9], LOS [median 26 days], number of cases in intensive care units [38%]). The median DRG fee was between EUR 13,800 and EUR 26,400. According to our model, the use of PI-PC compared to CONV-PC would result in savings between EUR 184 and EUR 306 per case.

conclusionFrom a hospital management perspective, oncological cases requiring PC transfusion are associated with a high CMI (reimbursement per DRG flat fee) and moderate costs with sufficient add-on payment for PI on a case level. Investment and process costs for PI implementation can be analyzed for site-specific scenarios.

Indexed as

Diagnosis-Related GroupsNeoplasmsHospitalizationHospitals, UniversityHumansIntensive Care UnitsRetrospective StudiesBlood transfusionHospitalsINTERCEPT Blood SystemPathogen inactivationReimbursement

Identifiers

PMID37482056
PMCPMC10664333
OpenAlexW4385186344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.