ArticleMedical image analysis2023
Automated detection and segmentation of pulmonary embolisms on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) using deep learning but without manual outlining.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in computed tomography imaging for pulmonary embolism: a narrative review from computed tomography pulmonary angiography to non-contrast computed tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- Urinary Cell-Free DNA detection platform for bacterial cystitis diagnosis via spot-based machine learning.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Simultaneous synthesis of perfusion and ventilation images from CT using a dual-decoder residual attention network for lung disease diagnosis.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based segmentation of acute pulmonary embolism in cardiac CT images.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Advancing Pulmonary Embolism Detection with Integrated Deep Learning Architectures.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Simulation-Driven Annotation-Free Deep Learning for Automated Detection and Segmentation of Airway Mucus Plugs on Non-Contrast CT Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A deep learning model for the interpretable identification of pulmonary thromboembolism from computed tomography pulmonary angiography.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Developing a novel deep learning-based model for automatic right ventricular parameters assessment on ctpa in pulmonary embolism.Emergency radiology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive review of pulmonary embolism imaging: past, present and future innovations in computed tomography (CT) and other diagnostic techniques.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- AI-Enhanced Deep Learning Framework for Pulmonary Embolism Detection in CT Angiography.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep learning-driven pulmonary artery and vein segmentation reveals demography-associated vasculature anatomical differences.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Detection and segmentation of pulmonary embolism in 3D CT pulmonary angiography using a threshold adjustment segmentation network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics, clinical laboratories, and risk factors of elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated with pulmonary embolism.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The promise and limitations of artificial intelligence in CTPA-based pulmonary embolism detection.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Advancements in Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in the Radiological Detection of Pulmonary Embolism.Cureus · 2025Review
- CT-Derived Features as Predictors of Clot Burden and Resolution.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Pulmonary Embolism: Is AI One of the Team?Open respiratory archives · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a novel computer algorithm to automatically detect and segment pulmonary embolisms (PEs) on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA). This algorithm is based on deep learning but does not require manual outlines of the PE regions. Given a CTPA scan, both intra- and extra-pulmonary arteries were firstly segmented. The arteries were then partitioned into several parts based on size (radius). Adaptive thresholding and constrained morphological operations were used to identify suspicious PE regions within each part. The confidence of a suspicious region to be PE was scored based on its contrast in the arteries. This approach was applied to the publicly available RSNA Pulmonary Embolism CT Dataset (RSNA-PE) to identify three-dimensional (3-D) PE negative and positive image patches, which were used to train a 3-D Recurrent Residual U-Net (R2-Unet) to automatically segment PE. The feasibility of this computer algorithm was validated on an independent test set consisting of 91 CTPA scans acquired from a different medical institute, where the PE regions were manually located and outlined by a thoracic radiologist (>18 years' experience). An R2-Unet model was also trained and validated on the manual outlines using a 5-fold cross-validation method. The CNN model trained on the high-confident PE regions showed a Dice coefficient of 0.676±0.168 and a false positive rate of 1.86 per CT scan, while the CNN model trained on the manual outlines demonstrated a Dice coefficient of 0.647±0.192 and a false positive rate of 4.20 per CT scan. The former model performed significantly better than the latter model (p<0.01). The promising performance of the developed PE detection and segmentation algorithm suggests the feasibility of training a deep learning network without dedicating significant efforts to manual annotations of the PE regions on CTPA scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.