ArticleHeredity2023
Cauchy combination methods for the detection of gene-environment interactions for rare variants related to quantitative phenotypes.
Article in Heredity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The characterization of gene-environment interactions (GEIs) can provide detailed insights into the biological mechanisms underlying complex diseases. Despite recent interest in GEIs for rare variants, published GEI tests are underpowered for an extremely small proportion of causal rare variants in a gene or a region. By extending the aggregated Cauchy association test (ACAT), we propose three GEI tests to address this issue: a Cauchy combination GEI test with fixed main effects (CCGEI-F), a Cauchy combination GEI test with random main effects (CCGEI-R), and an omnibus Cauchy combination GEI test (CCGEI-O). ACAT was applied to combine p values of single-variant GEI analyses to obtain CCGEI-F and CCGEI-R and p values of multiple GEI tests were combined in CCGEI-O. Through numerical simulations, for small numbers of causal variants, CCGEI-F, CCGEI-R and CCGEI-O provided approximately 5% higher power than the existing GEI tests INT-FIX and INT-RAN; however, they had slightly higher power than the existing GEI test TOW-GE. For large numbers of causal variants, although CCGEI-F and CCGEI-R exhibited comparable or slightly lower power values than the competing tests, the results were still satisfactory. Among all simulation conditions evaluated, CCGEI-O provided significantly higher power than that of competing GEI tests. We further applied our GEI tests in genome-wide analyses of systolic blood pressure or diastolic blood pressure to detect gene-body mass index (BMI) interactions, using whole-exome sequencing data from UK Biobank. At a suggestive significance level of 1.0 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.